Showing posts with label John Mayer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Mayer. Show all posts
Sunday, November 17, 2013
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
'Cause when you're done with this world you know the next is up to you.
Walt Grace's Submarine Test, January 1967 from John Mayer's new album Born and Raised.
Thursday, March 1, 2012
Hard times let me be.
The album comes out on May 22. In the meantime, since he's released the track list ...
1. Queen of California
2. The Age of Worry
3. Shadow Days
First single. Listen to it here on Soundcloud, or ...
4. Speak for Me
5. Something Like Olivia
Video from same show with better sound quality posted here, but it's only part of the song.
6. Born and Raised
7. If I Ever Get Around To Living
8. Love is a Verb
9. Walt Grace’s Submarine Test, January 1967
10. Whiskey, Whiskey, Whiskey
11. A Face To Call Home
12. Born and Raised (Reprise)
1. Queen of California
2. The Age of Worry
3. Shadow Days
First single. Listen to it here on Soundcloud, or ...
4. Speak for Me
5. Something Like Olivia
Video from same show with better sound quality posted here, but it's only part of the song.
6. Born and Raised
7. If I Ever Get Around To Living
8. Love is a Verb
9. Walt Grace’s Submarine Test, January 1967
10. Whiskey, Whiskey, Whiskey
11. A Face To Call Home
12. Born and Raised (Reprise)
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
And when I stand on these tables before you, you will know what all this time was for.
The John Mayer documentary "This Will All Make Sense Someday" is about the making of his first (2001) album Room for Squares. This film came on a DVD along with the CD. It's broken up into seven parts on YouTube. Parts 1 & 7 resonated with me the most.
Saturday, February 26, 2011
Because I knew exactly what I wanted to be.

This segment originally aired on ABC in 2003 - the year that Mayer released the album Heavier Things:
Monday, January 17, 2011
a year is a long enough wait.
This was recorded at Live Earth - 7/7/2007. Love Mayer's intro to this song:
John Mayer Live Earth press conference. He gives a shout out to Reverb for the org's work on his tours:) I fast forwarded it to the appointed spot:
I snapped these in the Eco Village at the 2010 Shoreline show in Mountain View, CA. I was there with HeadCount, doing voter registration:

John Mayer Live Earth press conference. He gives a shout out to Reverb for the org's work on his tours:) I fast forwarded it to the appointed spot:
I snapped these in the Eco Village at the 2010 Shoreline show in Mountain View, CA. I was there with HeadCount, doing voter registration:
Sunday, August 1, 2010
John Mayer: Everything You'll Ever Be, You Already Are To Me.
A newer recording of Mayer's unreleased, untitled new song:
For a recording from the potentially first time he played it live, and the lyrics, go here.
For a recording from the potentially first time he played it live, and the lyrics, go here.
Wednesday, July 7, 2010
Heading Home
Thursday, April 1, 2010
John Mayer - Good Love is on the Way :: San Jose, CA - March 26th
This doesn't have anything to do with the usual subject matter of my blog, other than that John Mayer inspires me to follow my heart.

I purchased a ticket to see John Mayer during the fan pre-sale, over 4 months before the actual date of the show. Finally got to see him last Friday at the HP Pavilion in San Jose, CA, for the first time since Summer 2008.
This was my favorite sequence from the show. It followed on the heels of one of my standard Mayer favorites, "Vultures." Thanks to the fan who recorded this!
Hopefully next time I see him, he'll play this (new) one, and the also unrecorded "Taking On Water." The video below was recorded in February ... so he's still playing it!

I purchased a ticket to see John Mayer during the fan pre-sale, over 4 months before the actual date of the show. Finally got to see him last Friday at the HP Pavilion in San Jose, CA, for the first time since Summer 2008.
This was my favorite sequence from the show. It followed on the heels of one of my standard Mayer favorites, "Vultures." Thanks to the fan who recorded this!
Hopefully next time I see him, he'll play this (new) one, and the also unrecorded "Taking On Water." The video below was recorded in February ... so he's still playing it!
Sunday, March 21, 2010
Everything You'll Ever Be, You Already Are To Me
My new favorite John Mayer song, first performed at the March 1, 2010 Milwaukee show. Fingers crossed that he plays it again this Friday at HP Pavilion.
Beautiful, I watch you try,
To see yourself through other's eyes.
But mirrors are a losing game,
They only show you backwards anyway.
The magic and the misery,
Come and go so easily.
But everything you'll ever be,
You already are to me.
And you were only five years old,
Playing princess in your mother's clothes.
Could you feel me standing next to you,
With my plastic sword and playground shoes.
Saying "If my dear I'm wrong somehow,
May dragons come and fell me now.
'Cause everything you'll ever be,
You already are to me."
Why, I don't know why.
I don't know why you think you need to do it.
How, I don't know how.
I don't know how but I just sit back and I see my way right through it.
When the memories are ten feet tall,
Throwing shadows on your bedroom wall.
When you pull the shades and kill the lights,
Will you hear me singing out tonight?
Will you hear me singing out tonight?
Days are long and words are cruel,
But they won't get the best of you.
'Cause everything you'll ever be,
You have always been to me.
Always been to me.
- lyrics transcribed by YouTube user Jimanjee21
Beautiful, I watch you try,
To see yourself through other's eyes.
But mirrors are a losing game,
They only show you backwards anyway.
The magic and the misery,
Come and go so easily.
But everything you'll ever be,
You already are to me.
And you were only five years old,
Playing princess in your mother's clothes.
Could you feel me standing next to you,
With my plastic sword and playground shoes.
Saying "If my dear I'm wrong somehow,
May dragons come and fell me now.
'Cause everything you'll ever be,
You already are to me."
Why, I don't know why.
I don't know why you think you need to do it.
How, I don't know how.
I don't know how but I just sit back and I see my way right through it.
When the memories are ten feet tall,
Throwing shadows on your bedroom wall.
When you pull the shades and kill the lights,
Will you hear me singing out tonight?
Will you hear me singing out tonight?
Days are long and words are cruel,
But they won't get the best of you.
'Cause everything you'll ever be,
You have always been to me.
Always been to me.
- lyrics transcribed by YouTube user Jimanjee21
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Who Says I Can't be Free? From All of the Things That I Used to Be. Re-write my History. Who Says I Can't Be Free.

photo: Mike, Abby and I at Jack's Mansfield, MA Tweeter Center August 2008 show
The 2 photos below were taken at a John Mayer/Michael Franti & Spearhead show last month by Abby Brazina, HeadCount's Philadelphia, PA Team Leader, and a member of the HeadCount Jack Johnson 2008 Tour Team. I LOVE the shirts!

photo: Mayer fans

photo: Mayer fans registering to vote at the HeadCount booth
Later on that night, Mayer brought 11 year old fan Austin on stage to play with him, after spotting Austin's sign that read, “Can I please play ‘Belief’ with you?"
Once the song had ended, Mayer yelled “That’s my man!” and “That’s your guitar, that’s yours,” and then Mayer gave the guitar to Austin.
Austin's mom said that they needed to be escorted out of the show by security because so many people wanted to take photos with her son:)
Another view of the stage here - I can't decide which video is cuter:)
I LOVE that Austin happens to be wearing Mayer's current "Heartbreak Warfare" Tour t-shirt, which I'm going to guess he bought when he and his mom first got to the show:)
Also check out this official Michael Franti & Spearhead vlog entry from the Washington, DC show - particularly about 2 minutes into the start of the video when Michael interviews the girls wearing the t-shirts.
Can't wait for the tour to come to HP Pavilion in San Jose, CA at the end of this month! :)
Labels:
Abby Brazina,
Austin,
Belief,
HeadCount,
John Mayer,
Michael Franti and Spearhead
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
"I Know the Heart of Life is Good"
John Mayer joins celebrities and activists to help Haiti on CNN's Larry King two-hour special last night.
From Mayer's Twitter feed:
7:17 AM Jan 18th from Twittelator - Just recorded my song for CNN's "Haiti: How You Can Help" special, tonight at 8pm EST. Made with lots of love and hope.
4:47 PM Jan 17th from web -Tune in to CNN tomorrow at 8pm EST for Larry King Live: Haiti: How You Can Help. I'll be contributing a tune from London.
10:03 AM Jan 14th from Twittelator - Not in case you haven't seen it but in case you haven't done it: text "HAITI" to 90999 to donate $10 to @RedCross relief efforts in Haiti.
From Mayer's Twitter feed:
7:17 AM Jan 18th from Twittelator - Just recorded my song for CNN's "Haiti: How You Can Help" special, tonight at 8pm EST. Made with lots of love and hope.
4:47 PM Jan 17th from web -Tune in to CNN tomorrow at 8pm EST for Larry King Live: Haiti: How You Can Help. I'll be contributing a tune from London.
10:03 AM Jan 14th from Twittelator - Not in case you haven't seen it but in case you haven't done it: text "HAITI" to 90999 to donate $10 to @RedCross relief efforts in Haiti.
Sunday, December 27, 2009
My Recap of COP15 :: We're On Our Way
The UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, Denmark (COP15) wrapped up last Saturday morning, December 19th. One hundred eighty eight countries (of the 193 represented at COP15) signed onto a new international climate change agreement called the Copenhagen Accord, essentially led by a group of five nations who were the first to sign onto the agreement - the USA, China, India, South Africa, and Brazil.
The Copenhagen Accord is a three-page, 12-paragraph, approximately 1,400 word document that basically lays out some foundations for future agreements. It's not binding, which means that it's not legally enforceable. Since the negotiations were led by President Obama, and not the UN (at a UN-led conference) there was some initial concern regarding how the UN would react to the Copenhagen Accord.
On top of that, the UN was limited in what they could do - they could not formally adopt the Copenhagen Accord because Sudan, Bolivia, Nicaragua, Venezuela, and Cuba refused to sign the Copenhagen Accord. (Though significantly, Maldives President Mohamed Nasheed signed the agreement. He announced this in the wee hours of Saturday morning, December 19th.)
Instead, the UN announced that they support the Copenhagen Accord, but what the UN meant by their decision to "take note" of the Copenhagen Accord is subject to interpretation. (Though Robert C. Orr, the United Nations assistant secretary general for policy and planning, said that “take note” was shorthand for acceptance.)
What IS clear, is that COP15 was a means to an end, and not an end - there's still more work to do! (And with that, more opportunities for change.)
So what does the Copenhagen Accord actually say?
* Average global temperatures should not be allowed to rise by more than 2 degrees Celcius above pre-industrial levels.
* By signing the agreement, the 188 parties who signed it “commit to implement .... quantified economy-wide emissions targets for 2020.”
- The initial agreement did not "spell out" what each country's target would be, or how they would go about achieving it - those are literally "fill in the blank" sections on the agreement, that each country is to fill in for themselves. Each of the 188 parties must submit this information to the UN by the end of January 2010.
* The document lays down some guidelines for how progress made by developing countries will be measured and accounted for, or in COP15 lingo “measurable, reportable and verifiable” (MRV.)
- Many developing nations, particularly China, are wary of the prospect of intrusive international monitoring of industry. The accord allows for “domestic measurement, reporting and verification”, but requires that this be reported “through national communications, with international consultation and analysis.”
* "New and additional, predictable and adequate funding” will be provided to developing nations for emissions mitigation, reducing deforestation, technology development and transfer and adaptation.
- Up to $30 billion will be provided between 2010 and 2012. Developed countries also committed to find a more substantial $100 billion by 2020. A significant portion of financing will flow through a newly established Copenhagen Green Climate Fund.

photo: Karl Burkart, who was covering COP15 for theMother Nature Networkholding up a copy of the Copenhagen Accord.
What's NOT in there?
Lots of people have thoughts on this, but here's my own personal gripe - as New York Times reporter Andrew Revkin pointed out in his blog post The missing 'P' Word in Climate Talks, "If you scan the most recent drafts of the climate agreement that delegates here are trying to complete, you’ll have a hard time finding the word population. I’m quite sure it’s not there. (Please let me know if you find it.)" For an explanation of why this is problematic check out this New York Times blog post by John Collins Rudolf. He covers a recent report that found that condoms and birth control pills are more cost effective than windmills and solar panels as tools to curb global warming.
So what actually happened over there?
Well it depends on who you talk to - for starters our President or China’s Prime Minister Wen Jiabao. I stand firmly with President Obama - check out the Administration's account of how it all went down on the last day of the negotiations. Then check out the New York Times' account of the clash between the Chinese and President Obama.
Here's a nice summary from David Roberts at Grist:
If there’s a party to blame, it’s China. It’s China that was off meeting with India and Brazil, trying to avoid getting ensnared in any commitments at all, forcing Obama to track them down. It was China that refused to sign off on the target of 50% global reductions by 2050. It was China that forced rich countries not to commit to 80% reductions by 2050, lest it some day have to live up to that target. (Yes, China forced rich countries to trim their ambitions. “Ridiculous,” said Merkel.) It was China who, up until the very last minute, refused to agree to any international verification at all, and only upon the personal intervention of Premier Wen Jiabao agreed to accept a voluntary system of reporting.
As for Obama specifically, here's the speech that he gave during the much anticipated Friday morning plenary, attended by all of the Heads of State and their staff. If you'd rather read the transcript then you can find it here.
What's next?
So while I think the finger should be pointed at China, since so many people are blaming Obama for the non-binding agreement that came out of COP15, the fact is that what China finally agreed to is instrumental to progress here at home, which itself is instrumental to future progress internationally.
As Senator John Kerry said in his COP15 speech on the Wednesday before Obama arrived in Copenhagen, “To pass a bill, we must be able to assure a senator from Ohio that steelworkers in his state won’t lose their jobs to India and China because those countries are not participating in a way that is measurable, reportable and verifiable."
If you have been following the climate change fights that have been going down in the US Senate for the past few years then you'll be familiar with that refrain. Now that China and India have taken responsibility for their greenhouse gas emissions, and have agreed to permit outside monitoring, it opens the door for action in the US Senate, and therefore the US Congress.
Internationally, the next annual UN Climate Change Conference will take place towards the end of 2010 in Mexico City, preceded by a major two week negotiating session in Bonn, Germany, from May 31st - June 11th. Some nations hope that Mexico City will be an opportunity to turn this basic agreement into a full, legally-binding treaty. But as Yvo de Boer – the man in charge of the process – put it: “We have a lot of work to do on the road to Mexico.”
Stay optimistic.
According to Yvo de Boer “Never before have we seen so many world leaders gathered in the stride for the climate. Even though it appeared to be very difficult [to get an agreement] 115 heads of state or governments chose to come to Copenhagen and engage. This is what we need to build on.”
As an exhausted Obama said before leaving Copenhagen, "One of the things that I’ve felt very strongly about during the course of this year is that hard stuff requires not paralysis but it requires going ahead and making the best of the situation that you’re in at this point, and then continually trying to improve and make progress from there."
You'll have noticed from what I chose to cover on my blog during COP15 that the US and international youth delegations factored very prominently in the international agreements. The relationships developed between international youth at the conference, the experiences and skills gained at COP15, and the opportunities for the youth voices to be heard by international leaders were some of the biggest achievements of COP15. There is reason for hope.
Here at home the youth have also clearly impressed US Environment and Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson and US Department of Energy Secretary Steven Chu. For more insight on the collaborations between youth and the US Administration see HeadCount CEO Andy Bernstein's blog post from his attendance at the recent White House youth energy forum.
And for as what's next, after Mexico City?
The New York Times suggests that the UN model of large summits of world leaders coming together to hash out agreements is dead, so long as nations continue to fight over "environmental guilt, future costs and who should referee the results."
Andrew Revkin and John Broder of the New York Times suggest that the details will be ironed out by a much smaller group of nations, roughly 30 countries responsible for 90% of global warming emissions. It was these nations that Mr. Obama rallied in a series of dramatic encounters on Friday to finally ink a deal that starts a flow of financing for poor countries to adapt to climate change and sets up a system for major economies to monitor and report their greenhouse gas emissions. This smaller group of nations will meet periodically to tackle a narrower agenda of issues, like technology sharing or the merging of carbon trading markets, without the chaos and posturing of the United Nations process.
In the meantime, I can't resist - John Mayer said it best - "Fight on, fight on everyone."
The Copenhagen Accord is a three-page, 12-paragraph, approximately 1,400 word document that basically lays out some foundations for future agreements. It's not binding, which means that it's not legally enforceable. Since the negotiations were led by President Obama, and not the UN (at a UN-led conference) there was some initial concern regarding how the UN would react to the Copenhagen Accord.
On top of that, the UN was limited in what they could do - they could not formally adopt the Copenhagen Accord because Sudan, Bolivia, Nicaragua, Venezuela, and Cuba refused to sign the Copenhagen Accord. (Though significantly, Maldives President Mohamed Nasheed signed the agreement. He announced this in the wee hours of Saturday morning, December 19th.)
Instead, the UN announced that they support the Copenhagen Accord, but what the UN meant by their decision to "take note" of the Copenhagen Accord is subject to interpretation. (Though Robert C. Orr, the United Nations assistant secretary general for policy and planning, said that “take note” was shorthand for acceptance.)
What IS clear, is that COP15 was a means to an end, and not an end - there's still more work to do! (And with that, more opportunities for change.)
So what does the Copenhagen Accord actually say?
* Average global temperatures should not be allowed to rise by more than 2 degrees Celcius above pre-industrial levels.
* By signing the agreement, the 188 parties who signed it “commit to implement .... quantified economy-wide emissions targets for 2020.”
- The initial agreement did not "spell out" what each country's target would be, or how they would go about achieving it - those are literally "fill in the blank" sections on the agreement, that each country is to fill in for themselves. Each of the 188 parties must submit this information to the UN by the end of January 2010.
* The document lays down some guidelines for how progress made by developing countries will be measured and accounted for, or in COP15 lingo “measurable, reportable and verifiable” (MRV.)
- Many developing nations, particularly China, are wary of the prospect of intrusive international monitoring of industry. The accord allows for “domestic measurement, reporting and verification”, but requires that this be reported “through national communications, with international consultation and analysis.”
* "New and additional, predictable and adequate funding” will be provided to developing nations for emissions mitigation, reducing deforestation, technology development and transfer and adaptation.
- Up to $30 billion will be provided between 2010 and 2012. Developed countries also committed to find a more substantial $100 billion by 2020. A significant portion of financing will flow through a newly established Copenhagen Green Climate Fund.

photo: Karl Burkart, who was covering COP15 for theMother Nature Networkholding up a copy of the Copenhagen Accord.
What's NOT in there?
Lots of people have thoughts on this, but here's my own personal gripe - as New York Times reporter Andrew Revkin pointed out in his blog post The missing 'P' Word in Climate Talks, "If you scan the most recent drafts of the climate agreement that delegates here are trying to complete, you’ll have a hard time finding the word population. I’m quite sure it’s not there. (Please let me know if you find it.)" For an explanation of why this is problematic check out this New York Times blog post by John Collins Rudolf. He covers a recent report that found that condoms and birth control pills are more cost effective than windmills and solar panels as tools to curb global warming.
So what actually happened over there?
Well it depends on who you talk to - for starters our President or China’s Prime Minister Wen Jiabao. I stand firmly with President Obama - check out the Administration's account of how it all went down on the last day of the negotiations. Then check out the New York Times' account of the clash between the Chinese and President Obama.
Here's a nice summary from David Roberts at Grist:
If there’s a party to blame, it’s China. It’s China that was off meeting with India and Brazil, trying to avoid getting ensnared in any commitments at all, forcing Obama to track them down. It was China that refused to sign off on the target of 50% global reductions by 2050. It was China that forced rich countries not to commit to 80% reductions by 2050, lest it some day have to live up to that target. (Yes, China forced rich countries to trim their ambitions. “Ridiculous,” said Merkel.) It was China who, up until the very last minute, refused to agree to any international verification at all, and only upon the personal intervention of Premier Wen Jiabao agreed to accept a voluntary system of reporting.
As for Obama specifically, here's the speech that he gave during the much anticipated Friday morning plenary, attended by all of the Heads of State and their staff. If you'd rather read the transcript then you can find it here.
What's next?
So while I think the finger should be pointed at China, since so many people are blaming Obama for the non-binding agreement that came out of COP15, the fact is that what China finally agreed to is instrumental to progress here at home, which itself is instrumental to future progress internationally.
As Senator John Kerry said in his COP15 speech on the Wednesday before Obama arrived in Copenhagen, “To pass a bill, we must be able to assure a senator from Ohio that steelworkers in his state won’t lose their jobs to India and China because those countries are not participating in a way that is measurable, reportable and verifiable."
If you have been following the climate change fights that have been going down in the US Senate for the past few years then you'll be familiar with that refrain. Now that China and India have taken responsibility for their greenhouse gas emissions, and have agreed to permit outside monitoring, it opens the door for action in the US Senate, and therefore the US Congress.
Internationally, the next annual UN Climate Change Conference will take place towards the end of 2010 in Mexico City, preceded by a major two week negotiating session in Bonn, Germany, from May 31st - June 11th. Some nations hope that Mexico City will be an opportunity to turn this basic agreement into a full, legally-binding treaty. But as Yvo de Boer – the man in charge of the process – put it: “We have a lot of work to do on the road to Mexico.”
Stay optimistic.
According to Yvo de Boer “Never before have we seen so many world leaders gathered in the stride for the climate. Even though it appeared to be very difficult [to get an agreement] 115 heads of state or governments chose to come to Copenhagen and engage. This is what we need to build on.”
As an exhausted Obama said before leaving Copenhagen, "One of the things that I’ve felt very strongly about during the course of this year is that hard stuff requires not paralysis but it requires going ahead and making the best of the situation that you’re in at this point, and then continually trying to improve and make progress from there."
You'll have noticed from what I chose to cover on my blog during COP15 that the US and international youth delegations factored very prominently in the international agreements. The relationships developed between international youth at the conference, the experiences and skills gained at COP15, and the opportunities for the youth voices to be heard by international leaders were some of the biggest achievements of COP15. There is reason for hope.
Here at home the youth have also clearly impressed US Environment and Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson and US Department of Energy Secretary Steven Chu. For more insight on the collaborations between youth and the US Administration see HeadCount CEO Andy Bernstein's blog post from his attendance at the recent White House youth energy forum.
And for as what's next, after Mexico City?
The New York Times suggests that the UN model of large summits of world leaders coming together to hash out agreements is dead, so long as nations continue to fight over "environmental guilt, future costs and who should referee the results."
Andrew Revkin and John Broder of the New York Times suggest that the details will be ironed out by a much smaller group of nations, roughly 30 countries responsible for 90% of global warming emissions. It was these nations that Mr. Obama rallied in a series of dramatic encounters on Friday to finally ink a deal that starts a flow of financing for poor countries to adapt to climate change and sets up a system for major economies to monitor and report their greenhouse gas emissions. This smaller group of nations will meet periodically to tackle a narrower agenda of issues, like technology sharing or the merging of carbon trading markets, without the chaos and posturing of the United Nations process.
In the meantime, I can't resist - John Mayer said it best - "Fight on, fight on everyone."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)